17 responses
You misspelled governments.
8/08/15 9:16p Governments 16 Types Infographic I found an error on the Pin from Pinterest the word ''Government'' was misspelled but I guess you already know that.
No comment
Your definition of Republic and Democratic are poorly stated...please find out which are which anf what makes them, very different to another...Thanks. In a Democratic Government you have a Majority Ruling but allows for the most corruption, while allowing to be ruled by many. A Republic, you must govern yourself to behave in return this frees up your your own freedoms, when you have a moral code of self conduct. Furthermore, your Offical who ever you elect are those leaders of moral Character of their moral codes of ethics, allowing laws that are enforced with a morality behind each one and lesser ones, are ignored, discard by overturning them or completely overruled.
Anarchy does not mean a lack of laws. It means a lack of rulers. Disorder is not equivalent with a lack of government. Humans lived for millions of years on this planet before we invented governments.
The definitions of fascism and anarchy are not entirely accurate. Fascism primarily is a form of government that steers the economy using commercial entities (industry, banks, labor), usually for war purposes, by using the perpetual threat of war to sustain public support. Anarchy is simply the absence of government, which if suddenly removed from coerced society leads to chaos and lawlessness as withdrawal effects, but small spontaneous orders always emerges as people gather for mutual benefit. Socialism is strangely missing from the list. A Collectivist uncle to Fascism, where government steers the economy through regulation or nationalization of commercial entities to solve perceived social inequities, perpetuating such notions to sustain public support. Nazi Germany blended Marxist socialism with Italian fascism and shrouded it in extreme nationalism and xenophobia.
Neither communism nor socialism is a method of government. They, along with capitalism, are forms of economic systems.
I disagree M. Sherry on this basis: Both communism and socialism require involuntary association to survive. Marx insisted that socialism would inevitably lead to anarcho-socialism; government was only needed to get things going. But there is always someone who descents and these systems can't function without total compliance. Intolerant of any descent, they must use force, which is the essence of all government. Whether a tribal council or a sprawling Soviet Union, someone is 'in charge'... it is government. They are economic systems, but involuntary ones; involuntary meaning governed.
8 visitors upvoted this post.